CMDB vs Asset Management: Do Modern Enterprises Need Both?

Imagine this: There’s a server outage during a critical client visit and no map for your IT environment. You cannot ascertain the components or software running on that server.

You somehow track it down, only to discover it was affected by unapproved software: that’s like a classic ‘shadow IT’ issue. Worse, you already owned similar approved software.

This scenario could have been avoided if you had a Configuration Management Database (CMDB) in place. You may have had an asset management system that tracks the asset's lifecycle and costs. However, without a CMDB, you'll be unable to track configuration details and their dependencies with other assets, missing critical configuration issues.

This article will help you understand the role of CMDB and Asset Management in IT environments, and we will explain why modern enterprises may need both systems.

CMDB: Track the functional lifecycle of assets

The CMDB is the central repository that stores information about all IT assets and configurations. CMDB manages configuration items (CI), which helps manage the delivery of IT services. A CI here refers to a service component or element that should be managed to ensure successful service delivery.

A CMDB manages the relationships and dependencies among various IT components, such as software, hardware, and network devices, collectively called CIs.

Role of CMDB

Significance of CMDB

Asset management: Monitor the end-to-end asset lifecycle

Asset management tracks physical and digital assets. It helps manage and optimize their use throughout their lifecycle, optimizing resources, efficiency, costs, and strategic decisions.

Role of asset management

Significance of asset management

Is that server an asset or a configuration item?

The decision to configure items vs. assets often leads to confusion. Let’s take the example of a server to understand this clearly.

To begin with, a server is both an asset and a CI because:

1) It is a physical/digital tool that has expenses and maintenance involved, which makes it an asset

2) When in use, it needs tracking by configuration management for details like software installed on it, issues occurring, and their impact on other components, etc.

How do we distinguish the server as an asset and CI?

Server as an ‘Asset’

The asset management tool will track the following attributes of the server:

As an asset, the server is observed from an operational and financial perspective. Under asset management, the information tracked about the server helps in the following:

Server as a ‘CI’

A CMDB treats the server as a CI and focuses on the technical configuration and relationships with other IT components. It tracks the following attributes:

As a CI, the server is observed with the content of its role and relationship in the IT infrastructure. The information tracked by CMDB helps in:

Asset and configuration management play crucial roles in managing the server and addressing different aspects of IT management.

How do you decide if and when to use a asset management system and a CMDB?

A thorough evaluation of your organization’s needs is required to determine whether and when to bring in a CMDB and an asset management system. Both have distinct advantages; however, their relevance varies depending on the organization’s size, ITSM maturity, and compliance requirements.

This will help you make an informed decision and settle your organization's ongoing dilemma of picking a CMBD when you’re already managing assets with software.

Organizational size: Large vs. small

The organization's size correlates to the number of assets and the complexity of the IT environment. As the organization grows, the IT environment becomes more complex and diverse.

A CMDB tool becomes essential if you have a vast IT landscape with numerous interdependent systems. Combining both systems is ideal for enterprises instead of using a CMDB vs. asset management approach. CMDB manages the complex interdependencies and configurations, and the asset management system keeps track of lifecycle and financial management.

Asset management is sufficient in the case of a small organization with a manageable IT infrastructure.

ITSM maturity: Robust vs. basic

ITSM maturity determines your ability to handle complex IT challenges. So, a more mature and robust ITSM process requires a more feature-rich system like CMDB. It provides data for processes like incidents, problems, and change management, enabling faster resolution.

An asset management system works fine for basic ITSM needs that only focus on asset tracking.

Compliance requirements: Stringent regulations vs standard

Compliance with standards dictates the level of control and tracking required for managing IT assets and configurations. If the industry demands strict adherence to regulations, you might need both CMDB and asset management. CMDB will ensure comprehensive documentation of configurations, and the asset management system will keep track of financial and contractual reporting.

A well-configured asset management system offering robust reporting will be sufficient for organizations requiring standard compliance.  

Conclusion

A CMDB and an asset management software provide detailed asset tracking and configuration management for an organization of your size and potential complexity.

The ideal approach should be CMDB and asset Management instead of CMDB vs. asset management.

This ensures that you get the configurations and relationship details of IT services through CMDB and the lifecycle and financial management of IT components through an asset management system. The insights into both are crucial for optimizing your IT infrastructure.

With Atomicwork, you get the combination of robust IT asset management capabilities with a comprehensive CMDB. It takes charge of both operational IT and asset tracking needs. If you're ready to improve the visibility and management of your IT assets and configurations, we're here to assist you!